1. The budget proposal “CAPS” offers little in terms of answers to its own questions.. By providing a short anecdote and incorporating a “broken line” as Clarke suggests in Tool 40, you could illustrate the struggle of students attempting to use CAPS and then break the anecdote with questions of how to proceed and why they are choosing to go in for counseling originally, which can address the main proposed question.
2. The proposal #TheWhoevers is nothing but questions and offers to foundational facts to begin research upon. It might to be more impactful to the reader to provide a current state of marriage and its involvement in social media, then foreshadow that all may not be well with integration of the two. Building up to the point of a dilemma between the infusion of hashtags and phones into modern weddings would present a dynamic problem that could be examined and potentially resolved by the end of the piece.
3. The proposal Rush is set up to be improved with personal experience/or even self critique in order to better hit home the sentiments expressed in the budget. To better explore the physical and emotional effects of the facility, he can insert himself into the experience and write on his own inner dialogue of the experience.